↓ Skip to main content

China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
50 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects
Published in
Environmental Evidence, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0071-x
Authors

Lucas Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Nicholas J. Hogarth, Wen Zhou, Chen Xie, Kun Zhang, Louis Putzel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 21%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 33 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#339,493
of 18,671,420 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,579
of 274,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,671,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them