The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0071-x |
| Authors |
Lucas Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Nicholas J. Hogarth, Wen Zhou, Chen Xie, Kun Zhang, Louis Putzel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 49 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#768,674
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#16
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,116
of 333,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them