↓ Skip to main content

China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 283)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects
Published in
Environmental Evidence, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0071-x
Authors

Lucas Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Nicholas J. Hogarth, Wen Zhou, Chen Xie, Kun Zhang, Louis Putzel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#383,915
of 21,321,610 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,622
of 287,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them