↓ Skip to main content

China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 336)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects
Published in
Environmental Evidence, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0071-x
Authors

Lucas Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Nicholas J. Hogarth, Wen Zhou, Chen Xie, Kun Zhang, Louis Putzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 7%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 57 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#801,474
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#19
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,729
of 332,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them