↓ Skip to main content

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
Title
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8
Authors

Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 306 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Master 43 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 73 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 27%
Social Sciences 47 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 5%
Arts and Humanities 12 4%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 99 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#305,642
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,480
of 313,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them