↓ Skip to main content

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 336)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
Title
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8
Authors

Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 313 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Master 43 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Student > Bachelor 17 5%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 75 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 26%
Social Sciences 48 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 4%
Arts and Humanities 12 4%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 101 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#314,085
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,509
of 314,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them