The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8 |
| Authors |
Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Zambia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 19% |
| Researcher | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 78 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 83 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 105 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#314,085
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,509
of 314,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them