↓ Skip to main content

Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 308)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
Title
Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8
Authors

Craig Leisher, Gheda Temsah, Francesca Booker, Michael Day, Leah Samberg, Debra Prosnitz, Bina Agarwal, Elizabeth Matthews, Dilys Roe, Diane Russell, Terry Sunderland, David Wilkie

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 307 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 54 17%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 60 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 81 26%
Social Sciences 50 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 11%
Unspecified 16 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 4%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 85 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#286,427
of 23,758,334 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,519
of 301,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them